{"id":17056,"date":"2014-05-03T21:58:29","date_gmt":"2014-05-04T01:58:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ssgreenberg.name\/PoliticsBlog\/?page_id=17056"},"modified":"2014-05-03T22:06:45","modified_gmt":"2014-05-04T02:06:45","slug":"definitions","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/ssgreenberg.name\/PoliticsBlog\/about\/definitions\/","title":{"rendered":"Definitions"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This page is for definitions of some of the terms I use on the blog.<\/p>\n<dl>\n<dt><a name=\"begging-the-question\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Begging_the_question\" title=\"WikiPedia definition\" target=\"_blank\">begging the question<\/a><\/dt>\n<dd>\n<p>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Begging_the_question\" title=\"WikiPedia definition\" target=\"_blank\">Begging the question<\/a> means \u201cassuming the conclusion (of an argument)\u201d, a type of <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Circular_reasoning\" title=\"Circular reasoning\">circular reasoning<\/a>. This is an <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Informal_fallacy\" title=\"Informal fallacy\">informal fallacy<\/a> where the conclusion that one is attempting to prove is included in the initial premises of an argument, often in an indirect way that conceals this fact.<sup id=\"cite_ref-Garner1995_1-0\" class=\"reference\"><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Begging_the_question#cite_note-Garner1995-1\"><span>[<\/span>1<span>]<\/span><br \/>\n<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<dt><a name=\"petitio-principii\" href=\"http:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/petitio%20principii\" title=\"logical fallacy in which a premise is assumed to be true without warrant or in which what is to be proved is implicitly taken for granted \" target=\"_blank\">petitio principii<\/a><\/dt>\n<dd>basing a conclusion on an assumption that is as much in need of proof or demonstration as the conclusion itself. A logical fallacy in which a premise is assumed to be true without warrant or in which what is to be proved is implicitly taken for granted<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This page is for definitions of some of the terms I use on the blog. begging the question Begging the question means \u201cassuming the conclusion (of an argument)\u201d, a type of circular reasoning. This is an informal fallacy where the conclusion that one is attempting to prove is included in the initial premises of an [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":4,"menu_order":2,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-17056","page","type-page","status-publish","czr-hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ssgreenberg.name\/PoliticsBlog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/17056","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ssgreenberg.name\/PoliticsBlog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ssgreenberg.name\/PoliticsBlog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ssgreenberg.name\/PoliticsBlog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ssgreenberg.name\/PoliticsBlog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17056"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/ssgreenberg.name\/PoliticsBlog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/17056\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17061,"href":"https:\/\/ssgreenberg.name\/PoliticsBlog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/17056\/revisions\/17061"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ssgreenberg.name\/PoliticsBlog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ssgreenberg.name\/PoliticsBlog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17056"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}