Yearly Archives: 2010


The Shock Doctrine

Does this sound like a must read book? 🙂

In THE SHOCK DOCTRINE, Naomi Klein explodes the myth that the global free market triumphed democratically. Exposing the thinking, the money trail and the puppet strings behind the world-changing crises and wars of the last four decades, The Shock Doctrine is the gripping story of how America’s “free market” policies have come to dominate the world– through the exploitation of disaster-shocked people and countries.


November 8, 2010

When I posted this, I had forgotten that I had a post with the same title The Shock Doctrine, on October 12, 2008.

That post had links to 6 video clips of Naomi Klein speaking about her book to a Canadian organization.

In that post, I had written the following:

I was in the middle of watching part 3 of the above links when I realized that I wasn’t feeling well enough to watch the rest of it.  Between watching this, and after watching a Huffington Post item previously, and participating in some Worcester Telegram & Gazette discussions, I am not sure how much more of this I can take.

Now that I am actually reading the book, I find that the revelations in the book do affect me in that way again.


It’s the Stupidity, Stupid

David Sirota authored the posting It’s the Stupidity, Stupid. Thanks to my friend MardyS for linking to this on his Facebook page.  It is the perfect response to my posting Poll: Americans Don’t Know Economy Expanded With Tax Cuts.

Sirota writes:

What could cause this intensifying politics of free-market fundamentalism at the very historical moment that proves the failure of such an ideology? Two new academic studies suggest all roads lead to ignorance.

The first, by Harvard’s Michael Norton and Duke’s Dan Ariely, finds that Americans grossly underestimate how much inequality our economy produces.

.

.

.

…the most powerful factor in our economic illiteracy is found in the other new academic report—the one examining our innate denial reflex.


Poll: Americans Don’t Know Economy Expanded With Tax Cuts

Bloomberg News published the article Poll: Americans Don’t Know Economy Expanded With Tax Cuts.

The Obama administration cut taxes for middle-class Americans, expects to make a profit on the hundreds of billions of dollars spent to rescue Wall Street banks and has overseen an economy that has grown for the past five quarters.

Most voters don’t believe it.

A Bloomberg National Poll conducted Oct. 24-26 finds that by a two-to-one margin, likely voters in the Nov. 2 midterm elections think taxes have gone up, the economy has shrunk, and the billions lent to banks as part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program won’t be recovered.

“The public view of the economy is at odds with the facts, and the blame has to go to the Democrats,” said J. Ann Selzer, president of Selzer & Co., a Des Moines, Iowa-based firm that conducted the nationwide survey. “It does not matter much if you make change, if you do not communicate change.”

Isn’t it odd how a news service whose primary duty is to inform the public can find out that the public is ill informed and yet not even think to ask about their own culpability?

When people read the news and find that the reporters of that news often miss the most obvious questions, it is no wonder that the news services are losing customers.  You would think it would be in the news service’s own interest to figure this out, but even with that incentive, they missed it.


In Writings of Obama, a Philosophy Is Unearthed

The article Writings of Obama, a Philosophy Is Unearthed by Patricia Cohen in The New York Times coincides more with my view of President Obama than it does with the article’s author’s view.

In New York City last week to give a standing-room-only lecture about his forthcoming intellectual biography, “Reading Obama: Dreams, Hopes, and the American Political Tradition,” Mr. Kloppenberg explained that he sees Mr. Obama as a kind of philosopher president, a rare breed that can be found only a handful of times in American history.

“There’s John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and John Quincy Adams, then Abraham Lincoln and in the 20th century just Woodrow Wilson,” he said.

To Mr. Kloppenberg the philosophy that has guided President Obama most consistently is pragmatism, a uniquely American system of thought developed at the end of the 19th century by William James, John Dewey and Charles Sanders Peirce. It is a philosophy that grew up after Darwin published his theory of evolution and the Civil War reached its bloody end. More and more people were coming to believe that chance rather than providence guided human affairs, and that dogged certainty led to violence.

Pragmatism maintains that people are constantly devising and updating ideas to navigate the world in which they live; it embraces open-minded experimentation and continuing debate. “It is a philosophy for skeptics, not true believers,” Mr. Kloppenberg said.


Dawn of a New Day

Dawn of a New Day is the subject of a memo written by Ray Ozzie.  According to Reuters, Ozzie is Microsoft Corp’s resident visionary and departing software chief.

In the Reuters story, they gave the following description of the memo:

Microsoft Corp’s resident visionary and departing software chief has urged the company to move on from its Windows and Office roots and imagine a “post-PC world” of simple, global Web devices.

I have to agree with one of the forces that Ozzie identifies as driving the change.

But as the PC client and PC-based server have grown from their simple roots over the past 25 years, the PC-centric / server-centric model has accreted simply immense complexity.

Complexity kills. Complexity sucks the life out of users, developers and IT.  Complexity makes products difficult to plan, build, test and use.  Complexity introduces security challenges.  Complexity causes administrator frustration.

I am going to miss the PC-centric days, but I must admit, right now the thought of buying a new PC fills me with trepidation as I think about all the installed software on my current PC that I will have to install on the new one.

As someone who enjoys writing his own software to solve problems, I hope the day never comes when I won’t be able to write software no matter what form the next computer revolution takes.  This memo just reminds me of the need to stay abreast of the coming changes even though I am retired from the software industry.  What I learned over the past 40 years will have to be constantly refreshed.

From what I have read, this effort to keep up-to-date will either keep me mentally alert or will drive my mental deterioration even faster.


How To Protect Against Firesheep Attacks

I found the article How To Protect Against Firesheep Attacks on the Computerworld web site.

Firesheep  adds a sidebar to Mozilla’s Firefox browser  that shows when anyone on an open network — such as a coffee shop’s Wi-Fi network — visits an insecure site.

A simple double-click gives a hacker instant access to logged-on sites ranging from Twitter and Facebook to bit.ly and Flickr.

I had to read this a couple of times before it hit me.  Someone else is running Firesheep on their computer to detect when you access your account on an insecure web site from your computer. You don’t have to be using Firefox to be hacked. Firesheep then allows that other person to access your account on that web site.  A few hundred thousand people have already downloaded Firesheep to their computer.

The article does mention some protective measures you can take.  For the ordinary user who has not taken any of those measures, you should not be accessing your personal accounts from an unencrypted Wi-Fi hot spot.  Most such spots are unencrypted.

I suspect that if you are accessing the internet via a wireless router that is not using strong encryption, then you are also vulnerable.  Places where you might do that other than your own leaky wireless router at home (if you are not using encryption at home) would be in a hotel or on vacation in a rented condo.


Update October 29, 2010

The article Firefox Add-on Firesheep Brings Hacking to the Masses in PC World, may or may not bring some clarity to this subject.  That depends on which of the criticisms in the comments you believe.


Diversion: Is it “2-D is really 3-D” or “3-D is really 2-D”? 2

In his 24 Oct 2010 post, SteveG points us to a Popular Science article, Fermilab is Building a ‘Holometer’ to Determine Once and For All Whether Reality is Just an Illusion. SteveG quotes, “More specifically, they are trying to either prove or disprove the somewhat mind-bending notion that the third dimension doesn’t exist at all, and that the 3-D universe we think we live in is nothing more than a hologram.” SteveG also points to a 45-page (FORTY-FIVE!) proposal for the experiment and, over the phone, he chastises me for not having sufficient scientific curiosity to read either his post or that 45-page proposal.

To which I say, “Blah, blah, BLAH!”

I already KNOW that the boundary between 2-D and 3-D is porous and you will, too, if you watch Brusspup’s video, Incredible Stereo Illusion.

-RichardH