Daily Archives: March 10, 2012


Democratic darling has also been critic

Well, this seems to be the week for the press to catch up to my blog.  The Boston Globe came out with the story Democratic darling has also been critic, subtitled “In book, Warren targeted key figures”.

In her best-selling book, she charged that Senator Hillary Clinton abandoned her principles and supported a bankruptcy bill in exchange for campaign contributions. Warren accused Joe Biden, also a senator at the time, of selling out women. And she chided Patty Murray – the Washington senator who later helped recruit her into the race and is now leading the national effort to elect her – for wanting to shame bankrupt families.

This mirrors my post back in December, Elizabeth Warren And Hillary Clinton Trade Lessons.  The headline on the continuation of The Boston Globe story on an inside page says, “Warren book may help or hurt her run.”

This furthers the point that I have been making to the Warren campaign with zero success.  You cannot change the fact that Elizabeth Warren has written several books.  I think the books are a tremendous asset to her campaign and should be advertised by her campaign rather than hidden by them.  If she doesn’t make a big deal of her books in a positive way, someone else will turn them into a negative.  Why wait around for the inevitable?  Why not get out in front of the curve?

I don’t know how many times the campaign will have to be hit over the head with these ideas before they finally wake up.  One almosts suspects that this behavior of the campaign falls under the category Greenberg’s Law of Counterproductive Behavior, “If you see a behavior that seems to you to be counterproductive, perhaps you have misunderstood what the actor was trying to produce.”


Elizabeth Warren: Whose Side Are You On?

Cape Cod Today has the article Elizabeth Warren: Whose Side Are You On? by Mary Wentworth.

She has some policy disagreements with Elizabeth Warren that are similar to mine,

First off, your Foreign Policy statement that “Iran is a significant threat to the United States and our allies” because it “is pursuing nuclear weapons” verges on warmongering.

She also has some complaints about the campaign that are similar to mine.

The web site does not invite a repeat visit. Rework it so we can find out what happened yesterday, what’s up for today, communicate with one another, contribute to fill a bat or a balloon when you need a money bomb, let us show how we can work together to promote your candidacy. Make it a fun place.

One thing that is different is that she has the professional political experience to give some credence to her observations.

Thanks to Michael Horan for posting this article on his Facebook page, where I first saw it.