Monthly Archives: November 2016


What Would Happen If We Just Gave People Money?

Five Thirty Eight has the article What Would Happen If We Just Gave People Money?

Basic income is not a single idea but a family of closely related ideas, which go by an assortment of names: universal basic income, unconditional basic income, social dividend, guaranteed annual income, citizen’s income, negative income tax, etc. But the core motivation — to address social ills by just giving people money — has a long history.

A good discussion of this intriguing concept. I haven’t had the chance to read the whole article. That is why I post it here. When I have the time, I can come back to it to read the rest of it.


What So Many People Don’t Get About the U.S. Working Class

Harvard Business Review has the excellent article What So Many People Don’t Get About the U.S. Working Class.

For months, the only thing that’s surprised me about Donald Trump is my friends’ astonishment at his success. What’s driving it is the class culture gap.

One little-known element of that gap is that the white working class (WWC) resents professionals but admires the rich. Class migrants (white-collar professionals born to blue-collar families) report that “professional people were generally suspect” and that managers are college kids “who don’t know shit about how to do anything but are full of ideas about how I have to do my job,” said Alfred Lubrano in Limbo. Barbara Ehrenreich recalled in 1990 that her blue-collar dad “could not say the word doctor without the virtual prefix quack. Lawyers were shysters…and professors were without exception phonies.” Annette Lareau found tremendous resentment against teachers, who were perceived as condescending and unhelpful.

In my more lucid moments, I understand what this article is saying. Sometimes I am even aware that “professional people were generally suspect”. I know how badly received is my attitude that I know something that someone else does not know. That’s why I would never be as successful as a candidate as Bernie Sanders was and is.

I have learned that using credentials to back up what I write and talk about is a losing strategy for exactly the reasons mentioned in the article. In my more self-aware moments, I do avoid talking about my credentials as proof of anything.

Ironically, the people on the left who came from a working class background but have achieved success through education, see those credentials they earned as proof that they are worthy. Think of Barack Obama or even Hillary Clinton. In the case of a woman politician like Hillary, they are proud of the struggle they succeeded in when they broke through the ceilings men placed over them. It is hard for anyone like Barack Obama, or Hillary Clinton, or even Elizabeth Warren to not want to tout education as the path into the middle and upper classes. What they don’t realize as politicians is that those who are still struggling resent their success.

What people who rise above the statistical norm cannot understand is that they should never let the following words pass their lips: “If I can do it, anyone can.” No, the statistics say that you are exceptional. Exceptional meaning that most people cannot do what you have done.

The frightening thing for Democrats should be that this article appeared in Harvard Business Review. It may be that Republicans will learn the lessons from this article before Democrats will. Maybe this is how political parties trade places in the political spectrum over long periods of time.

Think of how much emphasis Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush placed on the fact that they were only C students in college. They understood the need and the reasons to downplay educational success if you are going to win in the political realm. Even Bernie Sanders is quick to point out that he learned more from living life than he did from college.


Ralph Nader, “Democrats Have Lost Their Identity”

YouTube has the video Ralph Nader, “Democrats Have Lost Their Identity”

Big Picture Interview: Ralph Nader, Breaking Through Power: It’s Easier Than We Think, has a plan for progressives that could really shake things up.


I noticed that there have only been 16,914 views of this on YouTube as I write this. The challenge I posed to those viewers and anybody viewing this post is:

What are you going to do to get this number higher? I am going to blog it and Facebook it. If we all do that, then we get some visibility for this.

Another comment on YouTube was that the Green Party will take over from the Democrats. To that Idea I commented:

Nice dream. I voted for Jill Stein and volunteered for her after Bernie dropped out. I have suggested that name recognition is her biggest and top priority problem. She needs to concentrate on getting the world to know about her and the Green Party. I suggested she write a book and go on a national book tour to promote it. I see that Bernie Sanders has beaten her to the punch. He has already written the book and is drawing crowds on his book tour. If the Green Party and Jill Stein snooze, they lose.


Ok Hilbots, Time For Some Hindsight

Ok, I think it is time to elevate my response to a comment on a previous post on Facebook. A person quoted the ignorant meme that a vote for Stein was a vote for Trump. My response was:

A vote for Hillary in the primary was a vote for Trump. We told you that, but you refused to listen. When are you people going to own the mess you made, and stop trying to blame us who warned you that this is exactly what was going to happen? If you thought that anybody but a blue dog democrat would vote for the most hated woman in politics, then I just don’t think you realize that there are non-Democcrats who vote. How can you be so blind?

If you have to rig a primary to win, don’t you think that is a sign that you have a problem? If you have to sell yourself as the antidote to fear of the other guy, rather than sell your platform proposals, then shouldn’t you realize you have a problem? When you have to tell working people that the economy is just doing great while they are drowning in debt, low wage jobs, and the fear of homelessness, don’t you think you might have a problem?

When the “low-information” voter knows full well that your description of life in these united states at this time is just a bunch of malarkey, do you think you may have a problem?

When voters see you disrespect them by hoping they are ignorant enough to trust you instead of their own lying eyes, do you expect them to respect you back? How are they supposed to respond when you keep saying “I get it” when you clearly don’t get it?

Even in hind-sight you don’t get it. What are we supposed to do other than keep you as far out of the politics of this country as we possibly can? Are we supposed to give you bunch of losers another chance to wreck the Democratic Party? Do you think blaming us for the mess you caused is the way to win friends and influence people? No wonder you couldn’t win against Donald Trump.


George Soros and WikiLeaks 1

I have been reading a lot of charges about George Soros that claim to be based on documents from WikiLeaks.

I think I have found a thread into what WikiLeaks has to say. Here is one example that popped up when I searched what I presume is the WikiLeaks web site. This article is China Now Runs the World, Soros Says.

On Monday February 27th, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the Texas headquartered “global intelligence” company Stratfor. The e-mails date between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal’s Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defence Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor’s web of informers, pay-off structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.

I don’t find this article particularly damaging to George Soros, but perhaps there are such emails related to Soros and John Podesta. I post this entry point so that you or I can do more research if we feel like it.


Negativity Failed For Clinton But Worked For Trump

I was thinking that Clinton’s constant negativity about Trump didn’t work for her and to some extent it didn’t work for Jill Stein either. I liken this effect to trying to tell your daughter (or son) that you don’t like their boyfriend or girlfriend. Anything negative you can say only makes the daughter (or son) defend her or his choice more strongly.

The only thing that stumped me about this line of reasoning was that the negativity against Clinton seemed to work for Trump. I think I finally figured out the difference. There were enough people who started out with a strong dislike of Clinton, that Trump’s negativity just reinforced their natural inclinations.

I think the strong negative ratings for Trump were not so much dislike as it was mistrust and thinking of him as a buffoon. Judging from the popularity of his TV shows, there must have been plenty of people who liked to watch his performance especially when they never considered that he would run for President.

My trying to convince Democrats not to support Hillary was more like the daughter and her boyfriend situation.


Leonard Cohen, ‘Master of Erotic Despair’ Takes His Leave 1

The Forward has the article Leonard Cohen, ‘Master of Erotic Despair’ Takes His Leave.

Rock-poet Leonard Cohen, the “master of erotic despair” and the writer of dozens of modern classics that have been performed and recorded by everyone from John Cale to Judy Collins, Willie Nelson, U2 and Rufus Wainwright, died on November 10 at age 82.

The biography in this paean to Cohen is something I never realized nor appreciated.

I’ll leave you with this video that was included in the article.