It amazes me how many Progressives know that we should not be trying to change regimes in Venezuela, but even they are unaware of all the lies they have absorbed from the media about Venezuela.
One response said that before you can say the media is lying, you have to have solid evidence.
I provided a link to search this blog for posts about Venezuela. It struck me that more people need to see all the posts I have made about Venezuela.
Yesterday, I remarked about a Faux Noise interview Rep. Gabbard: Venezuela needs peaceful reconciliation, not military intervention.
This is a horribly weak response to Faux Noise. She never countered that the very steps we have taken to wage an economic war against Venezuela for over 20 years is exactly what has caused the suffering in Venezuela. She started off a sentence about if the USA really cared about the welfare of the people of Venezuela… She failed to finish that sentence with the demand that we lift all of the economic sanctions.
She could have mentioned that these sanctions of ours violate international laws.
She could have mentioned that the 50 countries that support our regime change attempts are either bullied by the USA or have economic interests in taking over Venezuelan oil or in competing with Venezuelan oil.
There are so many things she could have said to counter lie after lie told by the Faux Noise talking head. It is no wonder that people believe the Faux Noise lies, when even Tulsi Gabbard does not rebut them or give any indication that they are all lies.
Maybe she should have said, “I wish we had the time for me to rebut every false statement you have made in this interview.”
I have gone back to look at the Faux Noise interview to transcribe the comments of the interviewer so that I could make my own response.
Quoting our officials “This is not a coup, this is the will of the Venezuelan people. Let Guaido be in charge.”
Guaido was never elected to be in charge.
People in Venezuela have lost an average of 24 pounds. Hunger.
If those numbers are true, remember that it is our sanctions that are preventing Venezuela from importing food.
There are electricity issues to be clear.
The USA attacked their electric system and put it out of commission.
Millions of people have fled.
The USA has made life so difficult for the rich people in Venezuela, that many of them have fled to live with their relatives in the USA. They are urging the USA to get their riches back for them.
We have tried sanctions against the oil business.
Our sanctions have prevented Venezuela from receiving its main source of income. Any fallout from that is our doing.
None of that seems to be working to give the people of Venezuela what they democratically voted for.
The Venezuelan people democratically voted for Maduro, yet he is the one we are specifically trying to push out.
And the concern about this is that having this in our back yard you would have a foreign adversary have so much control from Russia that that is a threat to our security as well.
If we hadn’t been waging an economic war on Venezuela for over 20 years, there probably wouldn’t be any Russian or Chinese influence in Venezuela.
We hear from Secretary Pompeo and from the President that they are hoping for a peaceful resolution here, but you heard Secretary Lavrov say that our intervention is a grave violation of international law.
Waging an economic war is, by defintion, not an attempt to get a peaceful resolution. Lavrov is right that what we are doing is a grave violation of international law. Is he supposed to pretend that this isn’t happening so we can have a peaceful resolution? Contrary to Tulsi saying Venezuela needs internationally brokered and overseen elections, she seems to forget that Venezuela already had elections that were fairer than many elections in the USA. Since when does a sovereign country need international brokered and overseen elections in order to be deemed to be a democracy?
Do you believe Nicholas Meduro has been a horrific leader for his people and that he should go?
This sounds like a typical push poll question. Put an idea out there without providing any evidence that even you believe the statement is true.
The Venezuelan people have made that decision (that Maduro should go).
Another push poll type of question. In fact the majority of Venezuelan people have said that Maduro should stay.
Fifty countries that have backed Guaido, and say that he is the rightful democratic leader of that country.
Guaido was never elected by the Venezuelan people to lead the country. When he declared himself president, less than 20% of the Venezuelan people even knew who he was. In fact, the Venezuelan people elected Maduro as their leader. Of these 50 countries, all of them have either been bullied by the USA, or they want part of Venezuela’s oil riches, or they sell oil in competition with Venezuela. How many countries have either condemned what the USA is doing, or have been cowered into silence?
If you are a person who loves Venezuela and lives there looking to the United States and saying please help us, are you saying that you would turn your back on them even if they do need to military support and say sorry we are not doing it.
Another push poll type of question. Has Faux Noise taken any measure of how many people like this are living in Venezuela? Most Venezuelans on either side of the issue do not want USA interference. Many of the people who do want that interference want the USA to put back their rigged system that had most of the wealth flowing to the top, and very few crumbs left for the poor. We are fighting that battle in our own country, and cannot even get agreement on that fight.