Evonomics has the article How to Construct a New Invisible Hand: A Conversation with Peter Barnes.
A middle path between laissez faire and centralized planning.
When I say I believe in ‘what worksism”, another way to say it is a middle path. Don’t interpret middle path too literally. If it works and it is not an amalgam of two existing paths, I’d take that, too.
PB: Yes. I don’t think markets, at least as currently constituted, can self-regulate for the common good, nor do I think governments can plan, much less administer, a vast dynamic economy. So we need something in the middle.