Monthly Archives: May 2008


Who’s the Real Appeaser?

Follow this link to the article by Fareed Zakaria.

I think this article’s title does not do it justice. More than just an attack on Bush’s policies, it seems to me that it talks sense about the Mideast. It is a positive statement about what talking with one’s adversaries can do. It is also about understanding the motivations of ones adversaries.

I chose to use the word adversary instead of the word enemy. In this usage, I think of an adversary as one who stakes out a position that is contrary to the one you desire. On the other hand, an enemy is one that is seemingly unalterably hostile to you. It is not wise to behave in a way that  turns an adversary into an enemy.


The Bushes and Hitler’s Appeasement

Follow this link to an article by Robert Parry that summarizes the case that the Bush family aided the Nazis before and during World War II.

I don’t claim to have any knowledge as to whether or not these charges are true. It would seem hard to make these charges backed up by public documents if they were not true. However, past history has shown that more blatant lies have propagated without any public media raising any question.


McCain Endorser Hagee: God Sent Hitler, Jews Have Dead Souls

Follow this link for some sound bites from Rev. Hagee’s sermons.

I have no reason to believe that these sound bites are any more representative of Hagee’s thoughts than were the sound bites of Rev. Wright.  The complete sermons and appearances of Rev. Wright that I have on this web site, show that the sound bites were completely wrong about Wright.

Since I  do not claim to be fair and balanced on this site, I leave it up to you to do the research on Rev. Hagee.  Maybe as proved to be true with Wright, he means the exact opposite of what these sounds bites appear to have him saying.


IRAQ: The elusive Iranian weapons

Over the last several months I have read a few reports debunking the U.S. claims that Iranian made weapons have been found in Iraq.

This time I decided to save this link to an LA Times story that adds to the picture.

In a couple of years, the Bush defenders will start saying that everyone believed that Iraq was arming the insurgents in Iraq back in 2008 when Bush started another war. I want to have a comprehensive record to refute this argument.


Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola—Nature, Accident or Intentional?

In the National Press Club interview, the MC asked Wright about his claim that HIV/AIDS was invented by Americans (I don’t remember the exact words of the claim). Wright mentioned the reasonably well known incident of the syphilis experiment conducted by the government on some black men. (I know, I have read at least one doubter that this ever happened.) He then said that he believes that a government that would carry this out would be capable of doing something similar with AIDS/HIV. He specifically did not say that he knew that the government had done so.

In his reply, he mentioned an author of a book on the subject. I have always intended to look at the video again so that I could track this reference down. In response to one of my items on Huffington Post, I was given the following link:

More on Dr. Leonard Horowitz, the WHITE scientist who(sic) works provided the basis for Wright’s remarks:

http://len.healthyworldblog.com/ev/Symptom_of_a_Rigged_Election.html

I have briefly looked at this page. My first reaction is that this is another nut with a conspiracy theory. However, given the behavior that I have witnessed of the media in this whole Rev. Wright affair, it does make you wonder if this could actually be true. Someday, I may dig further. I post this link for anybody else who may want to look into this.


Excellent Defense Against the Effects of a Straw Man

Peggy Noonan has written this almost excellent article in the Wall Street Journal of all places.

If Rev. Wright were really the ogre that the media portrays him to be, then Noonan’s column would be a fine explanation of why that shouldn’t deter us from voting for Obama. However, Rev. Wright is not the person she assumes him to be. Why should we destroy Rev. Wright just so we can make a good point?

If she were the excellent writer she appears to be, it would have been nice if she could have made the point without buying into the anti-Wright propaganda. She could have said just what I said here. “If Wright were what the media portrayed him to be …”

Then she could have ended by saying that, in fact, Wright is the exact opposite of his portrayal.

Another way to look at what Noonan wrote is that it is an explanation of why some people hear hate in Rev. Wright’s sermons and speeches and some do not. Those who understand how to listen as she describes do not have their minds turned off by some of his remarks. They are then able to hear the whole message.

I understand the reaction of people who do not understand. At first, when I read Noonan’s article, I was so turned off by her opening remarks that I could not even read the rest of her column. I decided that it was silly to exhibit the same behavior that I was decrying. So I went back, and read the entire column. Because of that I was able to distinguish between the parts that I thought were valuable and the parts that I thought were wrong.


Please Help Fight Propaganda 2

I have realized that in all my posts about the Pastor Wright propaganda, I have missed one important piece.

I am asking you to help me fight this propaganda.

Please view as many of the videos in the following posts as you can:

After you are armed with the information from viewing the videos, respond to any posts or comment that you see on other blogs that are furthering the propaganda campaign. Try to enlist others in combating the propaganda just as I am trying to do here.

Even people who have been innocently misled by the propaganda campaign itself are furthering the propaganda by repeating what they think they have learned. Be nice about it, but try to correct their misunderstanding.