Social Security Privatization, All The Risks, None Of The Benefits 2


I just realized that the current financial bailout by our government is tantamount to a forced privatization of Social Security with all the costs going to the Social Security beneficiaries but none of the benefits.

The Social Security Trust Fund is running a current account surplus.  The surplus is being “invested” in special government bonds at low interest rates. The government is taking the proceeds from these bonds and spending them however it wishes.  Some of that spending is on the bailout of our financial institutions.  In the latest bailout plan, the government is taking huge ownership stakes in these institutions by taking warrants for stock options in return for the money given to these institutions.

Chances are very good that after the recovery these warrants will be worth considerably more than what the government has paid for them.  I don’t see any plan to give some of these profits to the Social Security Trust Fund that helped finance the bailout.  After this is all over, the government will still consider that the Social Security Trust Fund will not have enough money in the future to pay all benefits so they will either raise FISA taxes, or cut benefits, or both.

Why not give the Social Security Trust fund some of the proceeds from the investments they helped to finance?  After all, if it was a good idea for Social Security to invest in equities when they were priced very high, it is a much better idea to invest in them when they are priced low.

Admittedly, the Treasury is taking on some risk that supposedly the Social Security Turst Fund is not taking on, so a fair split of profits will require some thought.  This requirement of some thought should not be an excuse to deny Social Security any take in this transaction.


Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

2 thoughts on “Social Security Privatization, All The Risks, None Of The Benefits

  • SteveG Post author

    With the US government on the verge of losing its AAA bond rating, I am not sure treasuries are rock-bottom risk anymore.

    That aside, I would think Social Security would be a prime candidate for stock investing. It has a long time horizon, it can be well diversified, and it can be professionally and prudently managed. Since it is already paying for these equities, why can’t it share in the upside as well?

  • RichardH

    SteveG said, “After all, if it was a good idea for Social Security to invest in equities when they were priced very high, it is a much better idea to invest in them when they are priced low.”

    My gut reaction is that investing Social Security funds in equities was never a good idea. SS benefits are supposed to be the rock-bottom source of retirement benefits and, therefore, should have rock-bottom risk. Individuals can, if they so desire, take more risk to gain higher expected returns on their NON-SS retirement funds.