Daily Archives: December 5, 2009


President’s Weekly Address – On Job Growth

Below is the video of President Obama’s weekly address to the nation. I think the pose in the static picture that introduces the video is very unfortunate. Other than that, I agree that President Obama needs to keep repeating the message.


I know everybody wants the economy to turn around faster. That desire is hardly a good reason to stop the progress we have already made and go back to the policies that got us into the mess we are trying to get out of.

It is fashionable in the anti-Obama wing of this nation to deny that any progress has been made. Fashionable doesn’t make it truthful.


U.S. Judge Opposes Republicans on Elections [Tactics]-NYT

On 3 December 2009, the New York Times reports U.S. Judge Opposes Republicans on Elections [Tactics]. (I added the bracketed word.)

The Republican National Committee will not be able to use election tactics that have been linked to suppression of voting by racial minorities without court supervision, a federal judge in New Jersey has ruled.

The measures, known as “ballot security” programs, were the subject of a lawsuit between the Democratic National Committee and the Republican National Committee that ended with a consent decree in 1982. Under the agreement, some election tactics could only be used with court approval, including the creation of voter challenge lists, photographing voters at the polls and posting off-duty police and sheriffs officers at the polls in minority precincts.

(…)

In an opinion issued on Tuesday, Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise of Federal District Court ruled that the Republicans failed to show that conditions had changed enough to justify changing the agreement.

“It does not appear that the R.N.C.’s incentive to suppress minority votes has changed since 1982,” Judge Debevoise wrote, citing statistics showing that most minority voters support Democrats. “It appears that the R.N.C. has been largely unsuccessful in its efforts to attract minority voters. Until it is able to do so, it will have an incentive to engage in the type of voter suppression that it allegedly committed in the actions that led to the enactment and modification of the consent decree.”