Daily Archives: January 29, 2010


Krugman-March of the Peacocks (Dysfunction Junction)

In the 29 January 2010 NYT, Paul Krugman writes in March of the Peacocks about the dysfunction of our current political state.

The nature of America’s troubles is easy to state. We’re in the aftermath of a severe financial crisis, which has led to mass job destruction. The only thing that’s keeping us from sliding into a second Great Depression is deficit spending. And right now we need more of that deficit spending because millions of American lives are being blighted by high unemployment, and the government should be doing everything it can to bring unemployment down.

In the long run, however, even the U.S. government has to pay its way. And the long-run budget outlook was dire even before the recent surge in the deficit, mainly because of inexorably rising health care costs. Looking ahead, we’re going to have to find a way to run smaller, not larger, deficits.

How can this apparent conflict between short-run needs and long-run responsibilities be resolved? Intellectually, it’s not hard at all. We should combine actions that create jobs now with other actions that will reduce deficits later. And economic officials in the Obama administration understand that logic: for the past year they have been very clear that their vision involves combining fiscal stimulus to help the economy now with health care reform to help the budget later.

The sad truth, however, is that our political system doesn’t seem capable of doing what’s necessary.

On jobs, it’s now clear that the Obama stimulus wasn’t nearly big enough. No need now to resolve the question of whether the administration should or could have sought a bigger package early last year. Either way, the point is that the boost from the stimulus will start to fade out in around six months, yet we’re still facing years of mass unemployment. The latest projections from the Congressional Budget Office say that the average unemployment rate next year will be only slightly lower than the current, disastrous, 10 percent.

Yet there is little sentiment in Congress for any major new job-creation efforts.

Meanwhile, health care reform faces a troubled outlook. Congressional Democrats may yet manage to pass a bill; they’ll be committing political suicide if they don’t. But there’s no question that Republicans were very successful at demonizing the plan. And, crucially, what they demonized most effectively were the cost-control efforts: modest, totally reasonable measures to ensure that Medicare dollars are spent wisely became evil “death panels.”

So if health reform fails, you can forget about any serious effort to rein in rising Medicare costs. And even if it succeeds, many politicians will have learned a hard lesson: you don’t get any credit for doing the fiscally responsible thing. It’s better, for the sake of your career, to just pretend that you’re fiscally responsible — that is, to be a deficit peacock.

So we’re paralyzed in the face of mass unemployment and out-of-control health care costs. Don’t blame Mr. Obama. There’s only so much one man can do, even if he sits in the White House. Blame our political culture instead, a culture that rewards hypocrisy and irresponsibility rather than serious efforts to solve America’s problems. And blame the filibuster, under which 41 senators can make the country ungovernable, if they choose — and they have so chosen.

-RichardH


Whip Congress For A Public Option

I received an email about Representatives Chellie Pingree and Jared Polis who stood up to demand the Senate pass a public option using budget reconciliation.

Follow this link to see the Pingree/Polis letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.

In the link to the current set of 64 supporters, I found some interesting names from the state where I now live and from the state where I lived before this one.

Rep. Michael Capuano    MA-08   Supporter
Rep. Bill Delahunt      MA-10   Supporter
Rep. Barney Frank       MA-04   Supporter
Rep. Ed Markey          MA-07   Supporter
Rep. Jim McGovern       MA-03   Supporter
Rep. John Olver         MA-01   Supporter

Rep. Earl Blumenauer    OR-03   Supporter
Rep. Peter DeFazio      OR-04   Supporter
Rep. David Wu           OR-01   Supporter

Way to go Michael Capuano, my preference for the Democrat who should have won the primary for Massachusetts Senator in the recent special election.

I note that David Wu was my representative when we lived in Oregon.

In the post Going Nuclear – Path To Passing Health Care Reform, I noted my telephone call to Richard Neal.

Rep. Richard Neal       MA-02   Unknown

I just made another phone call. In a voice mail message to Rep. Neil’s chief of staff, Anna Jablon, I noted the Massachusetts Democrats who had already signed on.  I said I would like to see Rep. Neal’s name on the list.

Here is the email I mentioned above:

Steven –

Just two days ago, Representatives Chellie Pingree and Jared Polis stood up to demand the Senate pass a public option using “budget reconciliation.” To make sure they’re voices are heard with as much force as possible, they’re asking House Democrats to join them by signing on to a letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid demanding it.

Thanks to their leadership and the thousands of phone calls from members of Democracy for America, the Progressive Change Campaign Committee and CREDO Action, now 64 House Democrats are demanding the Senate take action.

These 64 Healthcare Heroes are a powerful force, but we must not stop now. We need to call every single House Democrat and get them on board.

CHECK OUT THE LIST OF SIGNERS – AND MAKE YOUR CALL RIGHT NOW

Speaker Nancy Pelosi says the House Democrats don’t have the votes to pass the Senate healthcare bill without changes. The media continues to report that Democrats in Washington can’t figure out the way forward since the loss of Ted Kennedy’s Senate seat.

But these 64th House Democrats are fighting for a plan that would get the job done and deliver the votes needed to pass real reform. The strategy is working. This morning’s 64 signer to the letter was Representative Scott Murphy from New York, who voted against the House bill last year, proving we’re not just fighting for real reform — we’re delivering the votes to win.

MAKE YOUR CALL RIGHT NOW

We hear people all the time wondering if making a phone call even works. It’s a good question; fortunately the answer is a resounding YES. Don’t believe me? After California Congressman John Garamendi signed onto the letter, his office had this to say to the press:

“When the phone calls started pouring in, it helped alert us to this letter. Now it’s yet another way for the Congressman to fight for the public option.”
– Spokesman for Congressman Garamendi

Our strategy is working. Keep building on the momentum. Please make your call now.

-Charles

Charles Chamberlain, Political Director
Democracy for America

Democracy for America relies on you and the people-power of more than one million members to fund the grassroots organizing and training that delivers progressive change on the issues that matter. Please Contribute Today and support our mission.

Paid for by Democracy for America, http://democracyforamerica.com/ and not authorized by any candidate. Contributions to Democracy for America are not deductible for federal income tax purposes.


How Not to Counter Terrorism

Follow this link to the story How Not to Counter Terrorism by Ex-FBI Agent Coleen Rowley and Other Intelligence Veterans January 14, 2010 (Originally Posted June 18, 2007)

This is yet another story that adds fuel to my observation that fixing the failure to analyze massive amounts of data is not done by increasing the amount of data. This was part of my comment in the previous post Consider How Well We’ve Done Against Terrorism Since 2001.

Also in the article they mention that one of the reasons for the FBI having a 10 Most Wanted List, is to have a way of focusing on what they consider to be the most important cases and not try to concentrate their resources on everything.

This reminds me of a situation that I observed when working for a semiconductor company in Texas.  We had a pilot line that processed integrated circuits that were being designed by our development engineers.  There were certain projects that were very important and time sensitive.  These were put on the priority list of the pilot line so that these devices could be processed ahead of other items that were before them in the queue.  Soon pretty much everything was on the priority list.

In response to this a hot list was put in place for the truly important projects. When everything got onto the hot list, they just changed the name again.

If they had thought of a top ten list, there just would have be item 1, item 1a, etc. until everything was on the top 10 list.

This behavior is just human nature. The reactions to this were just management’s human natured response to try to get ahead of the engineers’ human nature. It is a never ending battle to try to remember that there are priorities and not everything can be an emergency.

Of course a real top 10 list enforced by really strong management would have insisted that if a new item went on the top 10 list then an item that was already on the list would have to go. This would have forced people to make a decision when it is much easier to avoid making decisions.  The department could have ground to a halt with constant meetings about juggling a real top 10 list.  Sometimes it is just easier to pretend than it is to fight human nature.