Yearly Archives: 2010


In Honor of Melanie Shouse

Follow this link to the facebook page about Melanie Shouse.

Melanie was a tireless activist who fought until losing her battle with cancer on Jan. 30. She was fighting…because she understood that there were others coming behind her. President Obama

The article By Michael Sorkin St. Louis Post-Dispatch clarifies further the significance of Melanie Shouse.

On Thursday night, President Obama cited her case in promising to continue working for health care legislation.

In a speech, Obama spoke of Shouse’s death and her obituary in the Post-Dispatch.

How can I say to her … ‘We’re giving up’? Obama said.

I believe the Obama speech to which the article refers is the one in my post A Conversation With The President


John Edwards Revealed

Follow this link for a review in The Daily Beast of the book about John Edwards.

Say this for John Edwards and Andrew Young, the author of a chilling new memoir: they deserved each other.

Previously RichardH had sent me this link to Grifters’ Tale, a comparison of the John Edwards phenomenon to the Sarah Palin phenomenon.

I hope these stories don’t lead to a new cynicism that all politicians are like this.  I figure that when a person has an extraordinary ability to move people with his or her words, they could very easily realize they can use that ability for nefarious purposes.  Almost by definition, a successful politician has this extraordinary ability. Not every person with this ability becomes a con artist.  Some become trial lawyers, beauty queens, or movie stars. Perhaps for beauty queens and movie stars the looks move people and the words don’t matter.  Maybe the looks even work for some trial lawyers.

Of course, some con artists may just realize they can use their skills for political purposes.


A Conversation With The President

January 4, 2010, Organizing for America hosted a conversation with President Obama. The President spoke to grassroots supporters and answered questions about OFA’s plan going forward.

Watch the video of the event below.

This video answers a lot of questions you might have about what has already been accomplished and how we will accomplish the rest of the agenda.

Follow this link to the event on the OFA web site.

Follow this link to this video on YouTube.


Homeowners Walk Away From Mortgages

Follow this link to an article in the New York Times about homeowners who can afford to pay their mortgages, but decide it makes more financial sense to just walk away from their underwater mortgage.

Walking away – also called jingle mail, – because of the notion that homeowners just mail their keys to the bank, setting off foreclosure proceedings – began in the Southwest during the 1980s oil collapse, though it has never been clear how widespread it was.

My sense of history goes back beyond that. I heard from a Texas real-estate agent in the 1970’s that such a situation existed in the Seattle, Washington area during a severe downturn for Boeing. She talked about people mailing in their keys to the bank and walking away. As I recall, this agent had moved from Seattle area to the Dallas, Texas area.

Talking about one particular homeowner, the artile goes on to say:

Most of all, though, he struggles with the ethical question.

I took a loan on an asset that I didn’t see was overvalued, he said. As much as I would like my bank to pay for that mistake, why should it?

That is an attitude Wall Street would like to encourage. David Rosenberg, the chief economist of the investment firm Gluskin Sheff, wrote recently that borrowers were not victims. They signed contracts, and as adults should also be held accountable, he wrote.

Of course, another way to look at it is that the bank, too, was acting as an adult. It signed a contract that said in essence, you agree to pay back this loan or you will forfeit your house to me. The homeowner is merely taking an agreed upon option of the contract.

By the way, I have no direct personal stake in this issue. I am not underwater on a mortgage.


Food Rules From Michael Pollan Worth Following

Follow this link to the article in the New York Times, Rules Worth Following, for Everyone’s Sake by Jane E. Brody.

As Mr. Pollan puts it, If it came from a plant, eat it; if it was made in a plant, don’t.

I know it’s not politics, but it is an article I want to remember.  Besides being my politics blog, I also use this as a repository of useful information.


Federal Budget Outlook 2010 to 2020

Follow this link to the analysis by the Congressional Budget Office.

This report has interactive graphs that let you see the impact of various proposed policy changes.

Despite what you may have heard from the sound bites in the news media, the interpretation is not nearly as gloomy as you might think.

The important caveat that hardly ever gets mentioned in the media  is stated in the executive summary:

Those estimates are not intended to be a prediction of actual budget outcomes; rather, they indicate what CBO estimates would occur if current laws and policies remained in place. Toward that end, CBO’s projections presume no changes in current tax laws or spending programs.

The  stimulus plan is and always has been part of a strategy to run deficits when in recession and run surpluses when the economy recovers.  None of the administration plans to reduce the deficit are baked into the CBO plan.

The CBO projections also use an estimate of the economic growth rate into the future.  The growth rate experienced in the just ended 2009 fourth quarter was at least 50% larger than anybody’s wildest dreams.  (I know there were one time things that made it possible, but there can always be one time things, though what they are changes with time.)


The Bus Is Stalled On The Tracks And The Train Is Approaching

Let me propose a little analogy comparing  the current Congressional impasse with a stalled bus.

The bus is stuck on the railroad tracks and the train is approaching.

The majority want to push the bus forward to get it off the tracks. The minority say, No, push it backward. We won’t even help if you decide to push it forward. If we tried that, you might learn we were right, and then try to push it the other way. We don’t care. We don’t even want to try your way to see if you are right. We have just tried our way with your help and it didn’t work, but if we try it again we are sure it will work this time.

So the bus stayed where it was, the train hit it and derailed, the toxic cargo spread over the town and all were killed. In heaven, the minority said, See you should have tried it our way one more time. I leave it for you to fill in God’s reply.


I was once in a work group where there were two opposing plans to proceed. One got the go ahead and the other did not.

The losing plan was to proceed along a more traditional course. The proponent of the losing plan did not give up. He went up the chain of command pleading his case. He was rejected at every turn.

Would the group have been better off had he contributed his considerable talents to the effort that the group embarked upon? One can only presume so. He never gave up and never contributed much after that.

Even if he had been right, if he had helped the group proceed along the wrong path, they might have found out it was wrong sooner and the plan could have switched to the other tack.

Well, it is 27 years later and the results are in. An entire industry has been built around the path that the group did take. In fact the very computer you are using to read this message was designed with software that followed this successful path. There were advances made with the chosen approach as the foundation that were not even dreamed of 27 years ago.

The Republicans may be right or they may be wrong, but they refuse to let the majority even try their plan. Moreover, the evidence of recent history suggests that the Republicans are wrong. The current balance of power in the executive and legislative branches seems to indicate that the electorate disagree with the Republicans.

The very religious-like zealotry of the Republicans and their supporters is starting to be a major roadblock to progress in this country. (Did I say starting?)

Even worse, we have had years of trying the Republican way and it has proven to be an utter failure. Yet, the Republicans insist that they know best and they will continue to throw monkey wrenches into the gears to stop anyone from trying anything else. (Tradition!. I just watched Fiddler On The Roof again yersterday.)

Despite what Republicans may think, the Democrats are merely saying that the plan we have laid out is the best one that we can think of at the moment. As we implement it and gain experience with it, we will learn how to tweak it or discard it. The Republicans just say, no, we will not allow any progress in any direction at all, but our direction. We will not allow any learning. We will not allow any motion, but in our chosen direction.

In fact they seem to think that God is telling them what to do.


I once had a boss put me on a project that I was sure could not be made to work. I said to myself, I’ll show you. I’ll write all the software as you suggest so that I can show you it won’t work. Was I surprised in the end when it did work.


Years later I was on the other end of the decision making. I wanted a person in my group to work on a certain project that he thought was impossible. I said to him, Let’s go through all the reasons why you think this won’t work. Just to humor me try to come up with the best idea that you can to overcome each roadblock. After that exercise he concluded that it just might work. His efforts succeeded. That approach is now also very popular in the industry. In fact I got 6 years more work out of applying that idea in another company.

I then got another 6 more years of work at another company working on a project that was only conceived after the demonstration that the first idea could be successful. At the same time all the competition were working on the same idea.


It was 1967 or 1968 when I was traveling back from Cambridge, Massachusetts to Lowell. There was a severe blizzard going on. As I pulled into the entrance ramp to I-93, there was a line completely stalled because of the snow. I pulled up to the end of the line. I got out of my car to see what I could do to extricate myself from the situation.

As I did that another car pulled up and that driver got out to survey the scene, too. I started a rapid fire set of suggestions as to things we could try. Finally, he said, Shut-up and let me think.. So, I did.

Six more cars drove up to the end of the line and that is all she wrote. Eventually we were evacuated by a firetruck that was driving down I-93 picking up stranded motorists.

Two days later, I was able to go back to the scene and get my car out.