SteveG


Bank of America: Too Crooked to Fail

Bank of America: Too Crooked to Fail by Matt Taibbi is another one for the records.

The bank has defrauded everyone from investors and insurers to homeowners and the unemployed. So why does the government keep bailing it out?

I admit to only having read the first 3 pages of this 5 page article.  How many pages of a career criminal’s rap sheet do you have to read to get the picture?

The first 3 pages were enough to get to the explanation of why bank regulation was introduced and why revoking it has led to exactly the abuses that the regulations were invented to prevent.

For a time, this ridiculous rivalry between two strutting Southern peacocks was restrained by the law – specifically, the McFadden-Pepper Act of 1927 and the Douglas Amendment to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956. These two federal statutes, which made it illegal for a bank holding company to own and operate banks in more than one state, were effectively designed to prevent exactly the Too Big to Fail problem we now find ourselves faced with. The goal, as Sen. Paul Douglas explained at the time, was “to prevent an undue concentration of banking and financial power, and instead keep the private control of credit diffused as much as possible.”

Since the 1980s we have decided that “undue concentration of banking and financial power” was now due.  It shouldn’t be a surprise that stealing money is easier than earning it, especially if you own the police force.

The propaganda machine rolls on, making people more afraid of the people protesting the robbery than they are afraid of the robbers.

People seem to be saying, “Go ahead and steal my money.  Anything is better than being a socialist.”


Why Greg Smith Is Leaving Goldman Sachs

I just couldn’t resist, so I read The New York Times piece Why I Am Leaving Goldman Sachs by Greg Smith.

How did we get here? The firm changed the way it thought about leadership. Leadership used to be about ideas, setting an example and doing the right thing. Today, if you make enough money for the firm (and are not currently an ax murderer) you will be promoted into a position of influence.

I have no pithy nor even snide comments to make.  I have nothing to add, either.  I really don’t even have a reason to think this might be memorable and so worth recording on my blog.


The Student Loan Forgiveness Act of 2012

Here is a transcription of an email that I received about a proposed bill that makes a lot of sense to me.

The main points  described in a brief summary of the bill are:

  • Make student loan repayment both simple and fair
  • Jumpstart the economy and create jobs
  • Send a lifeline to student borrowers who have fallen on difficult times
  • Promote financial responsibility in higher education

For all the details, you can read the actual bill.

There are also answers to some Frequently Asked Questions.

Please sign the petition in favor of H.R. 4170 by clicking on the following link: http://signon.org/sign/support-the-student-loan

This seems like a needed first step to reinstating support for higher education, economic prosperity, and social mobility that has started to wane in this country.


Main Street First: Fixing Broken Markets and Rebuilding the Middle Class with Elizabeth Warren

In the hurly-burly of an election campaign, our memory of why we like Elizabeth Warren so much may grow dim, until we see a video like this one. This video shows us reasons for appreciating Warren that we weren’t even aware of.

At almost every moment in this video there is another jaw dropping revelation. If there were a video of me watching this video, you would see how literally I mean this.


This video makes it very readily apparent that Warren knows so such more than is visible from her current political campaign.

Why doesn’t the Warren campaign want you to see this video?

Of course, I am only guessing here. I am sure the the Warren Troll can come up with a good many other reasons.

I lost track of the political activist Mario Savio right after the Berkeley riots of the 1960s were over. It is news to me that he established a career that is worthy of remembrance as indicated in this video. I have not followed up and visited the web site yet.

We all know what the Republicans will make of this connection, if they find out about this video. At the end, I will mention how I found it, but you can bet the Republicans will find it too, especially after I blog about it.

My advice to the campaign, which they never follow, is to stop pretending the inevitable might not happen. Get out in front of the inevitable and turn it toward your advantage before the opposition tries to turn it to your disadvantage.

Ironically, in this video Elizabeth Warren talks about how a campaign could use technology to run a better campaign. Her campaign is most decidedly not taking instructions from the version of Elizabeth Warren who appears in this video.

Elizabeth Warren talks about crowd sourcing in this video. In a campaign context, I first heard the idea in an email from Scott Brown. Where is the Warren campaign?

Many of the things that Warren talks about in the use of technology for making the CFPB agency a strong one are exactly the ideas that her campaign needs to use, but the troll stands in the way of doing these exact things. He has a thousand reasons to turn down any suggestion that comes into the campaign via the Facebook page. (And to disparage the suggester in the bargain)

How to get the DVDs

So here is how I stumbled across this lecture. I was doing research on how one might acquire the rights to rebroadcast the lecture in my previous post, The Coming Collapse of the Middle Class. By the way, these two videos are wonderful companion pieces.

I found that you can purchase DVDs of these lectures from The University Of California TV.

The Coming Collapse of the Middle Class: Higher Risks, Lower Rewards, and a Shrinking Safety Net $24.95.

Before I had scrolled down to find the above video, I happened to notice this one.

Main Street First: Fixing Broken Markets and Rebuilding the Middle Class with Elizabeth Warren.

It appears from the UCTV web site that it will be easy to get permission to rebroadcast these DVDs in a non-profit situation.


Elizabeth Warren – Holding Banks Accountable – Charlestown, MA

For those of you who do not know about Elizabeth Warren’s expertise in consumer finance, here she is explaining how the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau is trying to simplify various consumer financial forms. The CFPB is the agency that Warren fought to have created and which she set up. The Republicans were too protective of the banks to let her run the agency, that is why we get to voter for her as the U.S. Senator for Massachusetts.


On her Facebook post about this video, she says:

On Wednesday, I met with a small group in Charlestown to talk about protecting consumers from tricks and traps hidden in the fine print of consumer loans. One person asked why banks and credit card companies aren’t forced to write in simple language that everyone can understand. Here was my response.



Elizabeth Warren Asks Us To Eat A Cookie

Unlike some in the other party, Elizabeth Warren seems to have formed her opinions about the Girl Scouts from first hand knowledge.


I guess we consider this post an antidote to GOP lawmaker: ‘Radicalized’ Girl Scouts ‘sexualizing’ recruits. Doesn’t it feel better than to have a politician talk to us in a calm, rational, sincere voice? Even Mitt Romney likens what some Republicans say to lighting his hair on fire to get attention.


The Troll On The Elizabeth Warren Facebook Page

In my opinion, there is a troll on the Elizabeth Warren Facebook page. It is possible that the Elizabeth Warren campaign is not getting the full benefit from Facebook that it could because of the behavior of the troll.

Of course, as one would expect, there is much praise for Elizabeth Warren from the postings on her page.  Occasionally a Warren supporter, such as myself, tries to convey some constructive criticisms of the way we feel that the campaign is missing opportunities to further promote Warren’s candidacy.

The troll seems to take it upon himself to disparage all criticism in what seems to be an attempt to intimidate people who make such criticisms.  It is unfortunate that the campaign seems more intent in quieting criticism than it is in learning from it.  This troll just reinforces this image which some supporters find so extremely frustrating.

It is not even clear if the troll has any official responsibility for the Facebook page.  One suspects that he does not.  If a person with administrative privileges on the Facebook page thought that a post was detrimental, then it would be better to just delete the post rather than try to intimidate the poster from further posts.

I start to wonder why a purported volunteer in the campaign and presumably a supporter would spend so much effort to patrol the Facebook page and turn off people who want to post there.

I would think a truly committed supporter would thoughtfully read the criticism and help to pass on the good ideas to the campaign.  If the troll is not the one charged with this responsibility, then who is?  Surely the campaign would not consider Facebook to be a one way medium of communication.  Surely they would have someone officially responsible for reading the feedback and not just responsible for writing posts.  If there is nobody charged with this duty, then this is just another example of missed opportunities to further the cause of getting Elizabeth Warren elected.

Is this a case of Greenberg’s Law of Counterproductive Behavior? “If you see a behavior that seems to you to be counterproductive, perhaps you have misunderstood what the actor was trying to produce.”

Speaking of that law, why would I want to post this on the Warren Facebook page?  Am I being the troll that I have just talked about?  That is not my intention.  I would like to communicate with the other posters and readers of the Facebook page and urge them to use whatever connections they have to the campaign to get the message through.  One or two (or is that a hundred) voices of  concern do not seem to be enough.

The question is, can we get our concerns addressed in time to rescue this campaign? Can we stop the people who are doing so much damage to the campaign?  Can we break through the wall surrounding Elizabeth Warren and get her to realize who her real friends are?


The Republican Field Of Hawks

Truth Out has Eugene Robinson’s article A Field of Hawks.

The article starts with:

Unless Ron Paul somehow wins the nomination, it looks as if a vote for the Republican presidential candidate this fall will be a vote for war with Iran.

and ends with:

The United States and its allies should seek to eliminate the Iranian government’s will to make a bomb, not its capacity. I hope Romney realizes that while sanctions and diplomacy may not be working as well as we’d like, they’re the best tools we have — and that an attack at this point gets us nowhere. But if he believes his own rhetoric, this election may be about more than the economy. It may be about war and peace.

I can think of few things that would strengthen Iran’s will to make a bomb than the constant threats and sanctions.  Iran may observe that we are a little more careful how we deal with countries that have a nuclear capability.  If they are trying to build a bomb, which I might remind you our intelligence agencies say they have no proof of, it could just be so that they can get more fear if not respect from the international community.

So if threatening and sanctioning Iran seems to be counterproductive to the aims of the United States, then it would put our actions in the category of Greenberg’s Law of Counterproductive Behavior, “If you see a behavior that seems to you to be counterproductive, perhaps you have misunderstood what the actor was trying to produce.”

I don’t know if this is the reason, but the most obvious one would be that our real motives are to gain control of Iranian oil or to at least take it off the market so that oil prices will rise.  That may not be the public’s motive, but you can bet the big oil company backers of the politicians would appreciate that.