Monthly Archives: April 2012


Elizabeth Warren Video on Sturbridge Public Access Television

You may want to catch one of the showings of the video

Elizabeth Warren at MNW Alliance 01/02/2012

Elizabeth Warren, Democratic Candidate for U.S. Senate, speaking to several hundred people at a meeting of the Middlesex, Norfolk, and Worcester Democratic Alliance on January 2, 2012, in Franklin, MA.

The program will be shown tomorrow (Thursday, April 19) at 10:05am, 2:06pm and 8:05pm.  I believe that it will be on Channel 12, the channel for public programming, public bulletin board (non-profit only) and all non-government community information.

Please spread the word.

If you cannot see one of these screenings or ones that may occur in the future, there is a three part video on YouTube that covers the same event.

  • Elizabeth Warren at MNW Alliance 01/02/2012 On Grassroots Government

Lawmakers consider changing tax breaks on retirement savings

The Washington Post has the article Lawmakers consider changing tax breaks on retirement savings.

On Tuesday, House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp (R-Mich.) scheduled a hearing on “tax-favored retirement accounts” that he said was intended to begin “framing the debate” in preparation for tax reform. Aides said Camp also is planning a first-ever examination of about $30 billion worth of expired tax breaks for individuals and corporations that Congress routinely extends, an idea that is also gaining traction in the Senate.

Whenever the Republicans want to frame a debate why is it that they want to smash that frame over the heads of the middle-class?

I may have to coin a new Greenberg’s Law of Closing Tax Loopholes, “When you ask the congress to eliminate tax loopholes, they always give the voters asked for  by eliminating any tax breaks that the those voters might enjoy and leaving the rest of the loopholes alone.”  I think this is their way of teaching us not to ask for closure of tax loopholes, even though they know pretty clearly which loopholes we want closed.  It is not the ones they focus on.


Inequality and Instability

In The Real News article Inequality and Instability, “James K. Galbraith presents his study of the world economy just before the great crisis ”

From the transcript:

GALBRAITH: The book is built on a new body of information or a body of information from which we were able to measure the movement of inequality in the United States and broadly around the world over a period of about 40 years. And by doing that, we were able to make a much closer, I think, more careful comparison than had previously been possible between economic inequality as we measure it and the other things that are known to go on in the economy.

And the most basic finding, which is the one you already mentioned, is that the movement of inequality has been very closely associated in the U.S. and everywhere else with the financialization of the world’s economies and with the rising share of income in the financial sector and in sectors favored by the financial sector, that is to say, in sectors financed by venture capital and credit flows. And so what you see is a phenomenon where inequality becomes a measure of the dependence of economic growth on finance, and therefore on the instability of finance.


I have not been able to find part two of this interview yet. Perhaps it will be posted within the next few days.


Help NationofChange Stand Up For Workers’ Rights!

Do you think that this effort will work?

http://www.nationofchange.org/mayday – Worldwide, May 1st is traditionally a ‘Workers’ day — a day of Labor Solidarity, and a public holiday. It’s a day to celebrate and march in support of im/migrant rights. In protest against the corruption of the worldwide marketplace, which has led to illegal foreclosures, mass unemployment, low wages, high taxes and a penalization of all those who do not own the ‘99%’ of the world’s resources, and in solidarity with the im/migrant movements of May 1st, we along with Occupations across the country decided to declare May 1st, 2012 a People’s General Strike.



In Senate, Republicans Block Debate on ‘Buffett Rule’

The New York Times article In Senate, Republicans Block Debate on ‘Buffett Rule’, is exactly what we had expected.

The National Republican Congressional Committee said vulnerable House Democrats could “either focus on growing small businesses by providing them tax relief to create jobs or help his party leaders raise taxes to fuel their spending addictions.”

The same old tired baloney.  With all the tax cuts that have already been given out,  the economy ought to be booming.  Major corporations are sitting on tons of cash. Their profits have never been better.  So why aren’t they spending this money to create jobs?  No freaking customers is the answer.  Or at least not enough customers to require them to open up their mothballed factories and put people to work.

If the corporations and the wealthy paid more taxes to take the strain off the middle-class, they would have the customers they need.  They would have to spend their hordes of cash gearing up to satisfy the new demand.  Instead, this cash they sit on has been sucked right out of the economy and is sitting idle in inflated “investments”.

For the so-called party of business, the Republicans sure do pretend not to know how the economy really works.  Of course they really know full well, but it is more important for their constituents to be able to brag about what a large part of the economic pie that they have than it is to grow that pie for everyone to share.

We really do need to have Elizabeth Warren to replace Scott Brown.  With Scott Brown’s deer in the headlights appearance, perhaps he really does not know how this economy really works.  On the other hand, Elizabeth Warren is an expert.

This is from the Warren campaign team leadership roles packets.

America’s middle class has been hammered for a generation now. If you are the oil industry and getting billions of subsidies, you better believe Washington is working for you. If you run a hedge fund and you manage to get paid in stock, Washington is really working well for you. But, if you’re trying to raise a family, if you’re trying yo get through college or send a kid through college, if you’re a senior trying to live on a fixed income, then Washington isn’t working so much for you. So for me, that’s what this race is all about. It’s about what kind of people we are and what kind of country we are going to build.

– Elizabeth Warren

Why are we asking students to take on more debt to get an education and seniors to live on less, while major corporations pay nothing in federal income taxes? It didn’t used to be that way. Coming out of World War II we made two remarkable decisions as a country. First, in a boom-and-bust world, we created a basic set of fair rules that ended the financial panics and provided almost a half-century of economic stability and growth. Second, we invested in ourselves and our children, creating the basic building blocks for a strong middle class and a strong economy: education, roads and bridges, mass transit and rail, water and sewage, research, and energy. It worked. America’s middle class prospered. We celebrated success, but also looked ahead, making sure that the basic ingredients would be in place so the next generation could do even better.

Then, about a generation ago, Washington turned in a different direction and the rules changed.

Financial cops were taken off the beat, and government regulators began to work for those they were supposed to regulate. We fought wars we couldn’t pay for, recklessly piling on debt. Powerful companies got subsidies, while ordinary families and small businesses became increasingly burdened. We didn’t repair our roads and bridges, and we cut back on research. We stopped investing in our future.

This did not happen by accident. Washington spent their time looking out for the billion dollar corporations and for Wall Street – and it all finally came crashing down in the economic crisis of 2008 and all that has followed.

In the midst of all this turmoil, there was one voice that spoke clearly, loudly, and courageously – not only describing what had happened, but naming those responsible, in order to both hold them accountable, and to make sure this never happened again. That person is Elizabeth Warren.

And now she’s running for the Senate here in MA.

But…

This election is not only about who will be the next Senator from Massachusetts. It’s really about what kind of people we are and what kind of country we are going to build.

Are we going to be a country that continues to subsidize already profitable industries like big oil? Or are we going to be a country that invests in the future, like education and clean energy?

Are we going to be a country that continues to provide giveaways to the big banks that brought down the economy? Or are we going to hold them accountable and help level the playing field so that middle class families can build a future?

Are we going to be a country that says, I got mine, and the rest of you are on your own? Or are we a country that believes in making investments in our future so that our children can be better off than we are?

We need Elizabeth to be our voice in Washington, to strongly demand that this country, once again, invests in our future and places value on creating opportunities for our children. To do this, we must first elect her the next US Senator from Massachusetts.


Oh, yes that nasty spending addiction of the Democrats. They are addicted to funding the promised, bought, and paid for Social Security benefits, health care for all, and investments in the future of the economy. I guess the Republicans don’t think this economy “needs no stinkin’ future”.


Geithner: Romney’s statements on women “misleading and ridiculous”

The article Geithner: Romney’s statements on women “misleading and ridiculous” is a clear demonstration as to why I do not watch the Sunday Morning noise shows.

Geithner admitted that the second part of the recession saw more female job losses, because of teacher and education layoffs due to state budget cutbacks.

Admitted that the layoffs were forced by the Republicans because they would not allow the federal government to send money to the states to forestall  these women losing these jobs.

“Basically you’re saying that [Romney] is right?” Schieffer asked.

Ever fair minded Bob Schieffer cannot come to believe that the Republican War On Women is real.  And poor Geithner is too flummoxed to point this out.  Let’s just hope that the CBS viewers aren’t as dumb as the Faux Noise viewers.

Schieffer needs to retire and Geithner needs to learn how not to damn the President’s accomplishments with faint praise.

Perhaps Obama needs to show us that he really wants to win this election by not allowing such foolishness to go unrebutted.


Anonymity cloaks busy nerve center

In the free snippet from The Boston Globe, Anonymity cloaks busy nerve center, they say about Mitt Romney’s headquarters:

There is little sign that this building in the North End is the hub of Mitt Romney’s national campaign.

Perhaps there might be some insights here as to why Elizabeth Warren’s campaign is also housed in a building with no, let alone little, sign that the headquarters is in the building.  Of course, if The Boston Globe web site thinks that you will pay to see the rest of the article, they have another think coming.