The Real News Network has the interview Wilkerson on North Korea Crisis: U.S. Should Stop the Threats & Own Up to its Role

So, if you want the bottom line, there isn’t anybody in the world today, after seeing us invade Iraq, after seeing us bomb Syria, after seeing us do –- we’re at war with seven or eight countries right now in terms of drones. We’re flying across their borders and killing people inside their territory.

So, if I were anyone in the world who thought my regime was in trouble, I’d think the trouble came from the United States, and I’d want a nuclear weapon too. That’s not at all to say I condone the proliferation of nuclear weapons. I’m simply stating the obvious. I’m stating the rational obvious.

I don’t have the teeniest tiniest amount of knowledge that Colonel Wilkerson has, but I have been able to figure this out years ago.

I have been thinking of a plot for a movie. Since I am no screenwriter, I offer this idea free of encumbrance to anyone who has the skills to turn this into an actual movie.

It starts out with a high advisor to a President Drumpf telling him that if he keeps up his anti-war stances, that he won’t survive one more week. Rather than cower into submission, Drumpf decides to go public about the threat. In a daring attempt to prevent his own assassination, he tweets the threat and names the person who made it. He then decides to cloister himself in the White House, so they can’t do to him what they did to John F. Kennedy. He then realizes that his family members are still vulnerable. He tries talking to Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren who were silenced in the same way they have attempted to silence him.

The rest of the plot is going to have to be invented by whoever decides to pick up the challenge and turn it into a complete movie.

Alternet has the article Trump’s Missile Attack on Syria Justified With Fake Intelligence, Experts Say.

On April 7, President Trump committed his first “act of war,” attacking Syria with missiles on April 7 in response to what he said was a poison gas attack by the Syrian government that killed dozens. But the White House’s subsequent intelligence report offering its proof of Syria’s role was “false” and “fraudulent,” suggesting a “cover-up” of a president acting without any intelligence or intentionally lying to the public.

When is a U.S. President going to be held accountable for acts that violate our Constitution? If I recall, on inauguration day, it is traditional and customary for the President to take an oath that he will protect and defend the Constitution.