Don’t Vote
Here is Hollywood telling you not to vote. (Rated R for some offensive language)
Here is Hollywood telling you not to vote. (Rated R for some offensive language)
Follow this link to see excerpts of McCain’s interview with the editorial board of the Des Moines Register.
If this isn’t truly the most scary interview that a presidential candidate has ever given, then I don’t know what is.
Not only has he lost all ability to distinguish between reality and fantasy, but he appears to be just barely able to control his explosive temper.
Maybe he didn’t actually believed what he was saying in this interview. In that case, what someone has observed as the equivalent of a tell in poker showed up if you watch the video carefully. I just heard a verbal description of the tell, so I don’t know if the tell occurred when he poked out his lips with his tongue or it was the sticking his tongue out between his lips that is considered the tell.
Maybe Stephen Colbert was the first to notice. Watch the end of this video clip.
Upon further research, I find that it is the tongue jut that is the tell.
Follow this link to a report in a British online newspaper about what a French magazine had to say about what the French deputy ambassador had to say about what the British ambassador said.
If getting your news fourth (and now fifth) hand isn’t definitive enough for you, then I don’t know what is. 🙂
Follow this link to see the GOP complaint and Barney Frank’s response.
Follow this link to hear the speech by Nancy Pelosi that is causing all the commotion. When I hadn’t read enough about the news yet to even know what Speaker Pelosi had said to cause this brouhaha, I loved Barney’s response anyway.
I don’t live in Barney’s district anymore, but at least he represents part of my state. Makes me proud to be from Massachusetts.
Follow this link to the New York Times story on how Sweden solved a crisis in 1992 that is similar to the U.S. financial crisis of today.
The New York Times describes Prime MinisterCarl Bildt as head of a conservative government. Having vsisited Sweden in the late 1980s, I would have to guess that any conservative Swedish government would be far to the left of our Democratic party.
In any case, the article shows that we do not have to reinvent the wheel in our situation. Many countries have been through this before. Many different paths out of the mess have been tried. Some paths worked better than others. Which politicians do you suppose are aware of these alternatives and how they worked out? Who is more likely to read the New York Times, McCain or Obama?
Follow this link to read the Editorial endorsement of Obama by the Stockton, California Record.
It must be the strong influence of MarilynH and HankH who are working for Obama in Stockton where they live. This is the first time in 72 years that this newspaper has endorsed a Democrat for President.
Follow this link to the story, McCain’s Reagan Gaffe: 100 percent Wrong about Reagan and Soviet Negotiations by Brent Budowsky. He even links to a Time Magazine article to back up his claim.
Who would have thought that McCain could be more retrograde than George Bush and Ronald Reagan?
Follow this link to the McClatchy News coverage of what might be the final bailout proposal.
First of all, I think this report on the plan is very even handedly done. This is one reason why I like to read the McClatchy news service.
The use of warrants to let the taxpayer participate in any financial gains is a great idea. It is also good that there is recoginition that the Government’s ownership of the mortgages can be used to renegotiate these predatory deals in ways to help keep people in their homes.
Perhaps it is worthwhile that the Republicans got to add the alternative of a more insurance oriented approach to the bailout. It seems reasonable to me to offer the “customer” more than just one plan.
My reading from this news story of Obama’s reaction to the deal is slightly different from the explicit interpretation in the article. I think Obama is just saying that the deal meets his requirements for gaining his vote. He is not making any claim for responsibility in the way the deal came out.
Follow this link to an item about John McCain’s refusal or inability to look Barack Obama in the eye during the debate. I didn’t notice this beahvior on my own because I have this bad habit of diverting my gaze when the scene is too embarassing for me to watch.
Following the item is a discussion of whether or not this nonsense should be a decisive factor in this election. It probably should not be, but realistically it is. Does my posting this link lead to furtherance of this bad behavior?
I listened to an unfortunate explanation of why McCain’s old military guy with experience persona would almost make you want to vote for him.
To be honest, I know I am influenced by first impressions as much as anybody else. Sometimes, when I become a little self-aware, I try to fight this influence. Or at least I tell myself that I do. When I reflect on my experience making hiring decisions, I can think of several cases where I am glad that I fought my natural tendency to let first impressions influence me. I can also think of a case or two where I should have fought the tendency more.
In some cultures looking another in the eye is not a good thing. For what it is worth, I would have to guess that the culture in which John McCain was raised would place a high value on looking people in the eye.
The best way for me to express my reaction to the first Presidential debate is to state some of the things that I think Barack Obama should have said. Let me seed the discussion with a few items. I will write it as the Obama part of a script.
You can add more to the discussion by making comments. It will further the discussion much more if you make your comments on this blog rather than emailing them to me.