Monthly Archives: March 2015


Markey: GOP Budget Is the Real March Madness

You can find this discussed in bits and pieces in a number of places, but it is all on Ed Markey’s senatorial web site in the article Markey: GOP Budget Is the Real March Madness. He has also posted this on Facebook.

In the Republican budget, special interests score big on tax breaks, Wall Street blocks regulation, billionaires take a bigger share of the winnings, and Big Oil remains undefeated. Meanwhile, seniors pay more for health care, working families pay more for energy, students pay more for college and clean energy companies cut more workers

Here is the video he posted on YouTube.

Ed Markey's Republican March Madness brackets

I am so glad to see our other Senator from Massachusetts get so visibly into the fight against the Republican strategy to give all the money in the world to the super rich oligarchs.

Makes me much prefer to stay in Massachusetts rather than move to Florida, despite the winter weather here.

While I made an offer on a house in Florida during our recent vacation there, it took us only a day to rescind that offer when we thought more about the kind of thing discussed in my previous post In Senate testimony, top Scott adviser won’t say ‘climate change’.


In Senate testimony, top Scott adviser won’t say ‘climate change’

The Miami Herald has the article In Senate testimony, top Scott adviser won’t say ‘climate change’.

However, rather than read about the conversation, it is much better to watch the video as provided by Crooks & Liars in their article In Senate Testimony, Top Rick Scott Adviser Won’t Say ‘Climate Change’.

I first heard about this story from another source which made it impossible to embed the video like the one above, so that source will remain unnamed.


Dem Rep. Blasts ‘Talmudic Scholar’ King’s Comments On Jewish Dems (VIDEO)

Talking Points Memo had the article Dem Rep. Blasts ‘Talmudic Scholar’ King’s Comments On Jewish Dems (VIDEO).

“I really do not need lessons from people like Steve King on what is to be Jewish or a Democrat,” Israel said on CNN’s “State of the Union.” “Steve King, who said that America is a Christian nation, should not be lecturing Jews about how we should be Jewish. You know, Steve King doesn’t know what chutzpah is, but Steve King defining Jews and talking about how we can’t be Democrats and Jews at the same time? That’s chutzpah.”

Although I do not agree with Rep. Israel on the topic of the country of Israel, and I don’t agree with him on other topics, I still liked some of his remarks here. I especially liked his disdain for Rep. King, the Christian Talmudic Scholar. Christian Talmudic Scholar is not an oxymoron except in the case of Rep. King.

In case you didn’t get the word chutzpah, here is the pronunciation from reference.com and definition below.

unmitigated effrontery or impudence; gall.


What we should be debating over the next year

Robert Reich has posted this on Facebook

I commented:

Are you starting to finally realize that Hillary Clinton, your friend, is not the right Democratic candidate? Never mind, Elizabeth Warren, how about Bernie Sanders? And will you please stop talking about the silly idea that raising taxes on the 1% is for the purpose of paying for some government programs? Raising the taxes on the ultra-rich is for the purpose of removing from their control the resources they are using to create the next financial bubble.

Just think, if people like Robert Reich started to talk about the real reason to raise taxes on the ultra-wealthy, it would legitimize such talk for people like Bernie Sanders. Having hired Stephanie Kelton as his chief economic adviser, I am sure that Bernie Sanders wants to talk about the idea, but he probably thinks Americans are not ready, yet.

It doesn’t seem like my comment will see the light of day anywhere else but here.

Well, I have to take that back. My comment did make it onto Facebook.


Tricks to see oil level on dipstick after fresh change?

A Camaro web site had the article Tricks to see oil level on dipstick after fresh change?

PERFECT solution, and so simple!

Got out the powder, pulled out the dipstick and wiped it off lightly. Powdered both sides and tapped it on the edge of a trash can to get off the excess (just left the finest film on it). I wiped the powder off from the middle of the hashed section down to the tip, and from 1/2″ above the full mark up. This left about 1″ of dipstick with the film on it. Slid it in, paused, pulled it out….Boom! The part to the top of the fill line was “gone” and the part over that was there, clear as can be. Level was just right (whew!). What a great solution. When you see how much powder is actually left on the dipstick after you tap it and wipe the top and bottom, you will laugh. It is such a tiny amount that there is no way it would be possible to hurt anything. I’ll do this again any time I have a question in the future. I love the forums!

I looked this up because I had just experienced the problem.  I have had difficulty seeing oil on a dipstick before, but this time was really bad.  I did just have the oil changed, but I wanted to check anyway.  I could not see any oil on the dipstick.  Tried four or five times, but couldn’t see anything.  I thought, “Well, I could just ignore the evidence, after all, I just got it changed.”  Then I thought, “Well ignoring what I plainly don’t see would be rather foolish”.  So I poured a quart of oil in, and checked it  again.  I still couldn’t see anything, but I thought that was the last bottle of oil I had in my trunk, so I might as well take a chance.

I got back home so I could search the web to see what other people have done to solve the problem.  A little Gold Bond powder later, I found that I hadn’t needed that extra quart of oil.  So I guess, I’ll just let the engine blow it through my rings and gaskets until the excess oil is gone 🙁


In Blistering New Report Bernie Sanders Exposes The Gimmicks And Fraud In The GOP Budget

Politicus USA has the article In Blistering New Report Bernie Sanders Exposes The Gimmicks And Fraud In The GOP Budget.

The Senate Democratic report exposed the real goals of the Republican budget:

Many of the Republicans’ cuts are left intentionally vague – clearly because they do not want to be associated with a budget that eviscerates programs that define who we are as a nation. In fact, some of the Budget Committee’s Republican members have told reporters in recent days that they want their plan to be deliberately vague, allowing them to avoid the criticism that was leveled on the Ryan budget when it was released last Congress. These members don’t want to own a budget that proposes tax reform that would dramatically shift wealth from the middle class to the ultra-rich. And they don’t want to be forced to defend a budget that strips health insurance from tens of millions of Americans, putting working families one illness away from financial collapse.

However, it is clear the Republican budget would do all that and more.

This article has a link to the report on The Senate Budget Committee Blog.  Who knew there was a blog?  It appears to be something invented by Bernie Sanders.  I am impressed by how he is using social media very effectively to get his message out without having to depend on the lame stream media.  One might actually be able to  run a successful presidential campaign in 2016 wwith the help of these techniques.

By the way, here is a link to the report of the report.  Here is a link to the actual document ROBIN HOOD IN REVERSE: HOW THE REPUBLICAN BUDGET PLAN IS A GIFT TO THE BILLIONAIRE CLASS AND WILL HURT THE MIDDLE CLASS, SENIORS, AND THE ENVIRONMENT.


Hillary’s trade dilemma

Politico has the story Hillary’s trade dilemma.

Union groups, including the AFL-CIO labor federation, also have deep concerns about the prospective trade pact with Japan and 10 other countries in the Asia-Pacific that, along with the United States, represent more than 40 percent of world gross domestic product. They fear the deal will encourage companies to move more jobs overseas, suppressing wages in the United States.

Clinton, as Obama’s secretary of state, is closely associated with the agreement, which could grow to cover 21 economies in the region, including China. “Our hope is that a TPP agreement with high standards can serve as a benchmark for future agreements — and grow to serve as a platform for broader regional interaction and eventually a free trade area of the Asia-Pacific,” she wrote in October 2011.

This article is a good description of one of the reasons that I would never vote for Hillary Clinton for President.

The excerpt above is also a good example of how Politico mischaracterizes the opposition to TPP. If you search for all the mentions of TPP on my blog, I don’t think you will find me worrying about the jobs shipped overseas.  My main concern is that TPP gives international corporations the right to overturn our laws without having to go before our legislature or even our Supreme Court.  Doesn’t that seem to be a bigger issue to fight against than even sending jobs overseas?

Of course, there is also the issue of giving “Big Pharma” unfair monopoly protection for their “patented” drugs and using the guise of the seemingly admirable goal of “protecting intellectual property.”  If intellectual dishonesty is one of the intellectual properties that President Obama is trying to protect, then he is doing a good job.


SEC’s Andrew Bowden Regulatory Capture Scandal Hits the Major Leagues with Los Angeles Times Column

Naked Capitalism has the article SEC’s Andrew Bowden Regulatory Capture Scandal Hits the Major Leagues with Los Angeles Times Column.

In yet another confirmation that blogging is not dead just because Andrew Sullivan got tired of doing it, Los Angeles Times columnist Michael Hiltzik picks up the Andrew Bowden story that Yves broke.

Lest you forget what this story is about, here is another excerpt from the above article.

Quoting Hiltziks’ regular Business section column, “The Economy Hub”:

As for “close contact and familiarity” between individuals and their regulated businesses, one need look no further than a March 5 appearance at a Stanford conference by Andrew Bowden, the SEC’s director of examinations. Financial blogger Yves Smith of Naked Capitalism, a former investment banker and management consultant, writes that Bowden “reveals himself to be captured to an embarrassing degree. His remarks about the industry aren’t merely fawning…. Bowden comes uncomfortably close to the line of offering to play the revolving door game at an unheard-of level of crassness, putting his son, and by implication himself, into the job market at an industry conference.”

The article cites a number of suggestions:

Things You Can Do

Readers, here are a few things you can do, right now, to keep this story in the public eye.

Putting this story on my blog is but one step that I am taking.

See my previous post Bank Super Lawyer, Rodgin Cohen of Sullivan & Cromwell, Says Regulatory Capture is a Myth where I gave secondary mention to article that is the main topic of today’s Naked Capitalism article.


U.S. should rethink U.N. funding if Palestinian resolution approved: senator

Reuters has the story U.S. should rethink U.N. funding if Palestinian resolution approved: senator.

The U.S. Congress should reconsider funding for the United Nations if the Security Council approves a resolution on Palestinian statehood, Republican Senator John McCain said on Sunday.

Now here is something that Senator McCain and I can agree on.  The U.S. should consider increasing its funding to the U.N. were it able to pass a reasonable resolution on Palestinian statehood.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu may actually have done us a favor by finally giving us a reason to stop blocking the Palestinians from getting U.N. recognition as a state.  If Netanyahu and hawkish American Senators think the way to get cooperation from a foreign country is to impose tough sanctions, maybe it is time to try this “successful” strategy on Israel.

I suppose Reuters own article Iran rejects ‘bullying’ as West stresses unity in nuclear talks can be used to show how successful this can be.

Iran’s top leader voiced mistrust on Saturday of U.S. efforts to reach a nuclear deal, even as Washington and its allies spoke of real progress and urged Tehran to take “difficult decisions”.

With just 10 days remaining until an end-of-March deadline for a framework agreement, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei denounced U.S. “bullying” in the negotiations and repeated Tehran’s denial that it was seeking to develop a nuclear weapon.

It seems that we have come to a consensus that bullying in the schoolyard needs to be stopped.  What do we teach our kids when we show them that we believe in bullying in foreign affairs?

Here is an excerpt from the book Ethics, Liberalism and Realism in International Relations that shows how some “elite” diplomats think.

Book excerpt

To me, this shows why “elite” diplomats are very dangerous.  When you have disdain for “ordinary” morals, what constraints do you have at all? I fear that President Obama, Secretary John Kerry, and Secretary Hillary Clinton have all been infected with Henry Kissinger’s theories of diplomacy.


Google translate couldn’t handle this, but a regular Google search could.

noun: Weltanschauung; plural noun: Weltanschauungen

a particular philosophy or view of life; the worldview of an individual or group.